Chrysler 300C 2005 vs Audi A6 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 218 HP | 240 HP | |
| Torque: | 510 NM | 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 seconds | 6.8 seconds | |
|
Audi A6 is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler 300C engine produces 22 HP less power than Audi A6, but torque is 10 NM more than Audi A6. Due to the lower power, Chrysler 300C reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 7.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.1 l/100km | 8.8 l/100km | |
|
The Audi A6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Chrysler 300C consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler 300C could require 150 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler 300C consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 1370 km on highway | ||
| 740 km with real consumption | 900 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi A6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 480'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Audi A6 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Jeep Commander | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Audi A4, Audi A5, Audi Q5 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Audi A6 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.02 m | 4.93 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Chrysler 300C is larger. Chrysler 300C is 9 cm longer than the Audi A6, 2 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler 300C is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 504 litres | 546 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
504 litres | no data | |
|
Audi A6 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chrysler 300C has 42 litres less trunk space than the Audi A6. This could mean that the Chrysler 300C uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler 300C is 0.1 metres more than that of the Audi A6. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`360 | 2`365 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 6000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.0/10 | 9.1/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 300C has
|
Audi A6 has
| |