Chrysler 300C 2005 vs Peugeot 607 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 218 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 510 NM | 317 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 seconds | 12.1 seconds | |
|
Chrysler 300C is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler 300C engine produces 82 HP more power than Peugeot 607, whereas torque is 193 NM more than Peugeot 607. Thanks to more power Chrysler 300C reaches 100 km/h speed 4.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 7.2 | |
|
The Peugeot 607 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler 300C consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Peugeot 607, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler 300C could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 1110 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 1370 km on highway | ||
| Peugeot 607 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Peugeot 607) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Chrysler 300C) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.02 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Chrysler 300C is larger. Chrysler 300C is 15 cm longer than the Peugeot 607, 4 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler 300C is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 504 litres | 481 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
504 litres | no data | |
|
Chrysler 300C has more luggage capacity. Chrysler 300C has 23 litres more trunk space than the Peugeot 607. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler 300C is 0.6 metres more than that of the Peugeot 607, which means Chrysler 300C can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`360 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4000 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 300C has
|
Peugeot 607 has
| |