Chrysler 300C 2005 vs Dodge Charger 2005
| Body: | Sedan | Coupe | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.7 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 218 HP | 193 HP | |
| Torque: | 510 NM | 258 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Chrysler 300C engine produces 25 HP more power than Dodge Charger, whereas torque is 252 NM more than Dodge Charger. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 9.8 | |
|
The Chrysler 300C is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler 300C consumes 1.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Dodge Charger, which means that by driving the Chrysler 300C over 15,000 km in a year you can save 255 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 690 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 800 km on highway | ||
| Chrysler 300C gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 440'000 km | 460'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 5 years | 13 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jeep Grand Cherokee, Jeep Commander | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Chrysler 300C, Chrysler 300M, Chrysler Sebring, Dodge Intrepid | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Dodge Charger might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Chrysler 300C 2005 3.0 engine: The main issues with this diesel engine stem from the fuel system and its sensitive piezo injectors. These injectors are known for being highly demanding in terms of fuel quality, which can lead to performance ... More about Chrysler 300C 2005 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.02 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chrysler 300C is 6 cm shorter than the Dodge Charger, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 504 litres | 456 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
504 litres | no data | |
|
Chrysler 300C has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, Chrysler 300C has 48 litres more trunk space than the Dodge Charger. The Dodge Charger may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler 300C is 0.1 metres more than that of the Dodge Charger. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`360 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 300C has
|
Dodge Charger has
| |