Chrysler 300C 2005 vs Chevrolet Impala 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 218 HP | 214 HP | |
| Torque: | 510 NM | 290 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.6 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
Chrysler 300C is more dynamic to drive. Chrysler 300C engine produces 4 HP more power than Chevrolet Impala, whereas torque is 220 NM more than Chevrolet Impala. Thanks to more power Chrysler 300C reaches 100 km/h speed 1.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 | 9.0 | |
|
The Chrysler 300C is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler 300C consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Impala, which means that by driving the Chrysler 300C over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 1010 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
| Chrysler 300C gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Chevrolet Impala) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Chrysler 300C) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| Chrysler 300C 2005 3.0 engine: The main issues with this diesel engine stem from the fuel system and its sensitive piezo injectors. These injectors are known for being highly demanding in terms of fuel quality, which can lead to performance ... More about Chrysler 300C 2005 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.02 m | 5.09 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.49 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chrysler 300C is 7 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Impala, 3 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler 300C is 1 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 504 litres | 527 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
504 litres | no data | |
|
Chevrolet Impala has more luggage space. Chrysler 300C has 23 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Impala. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`360 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 5200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 300C has
|
| |