Chrysler 300C 2004 vs Audi A6 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Petrol | 2.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 193 HP | 190 HP | |
| Torque: | 257 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 8.3 seconds | |
|
Audi A6 is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler 300C engine produces 3 HP more power than Audi A6, but torque is 23 NM less than Audi A6. Despite the higher power, Chrysler 300C reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 | 8.4 | |
|
The Audi A6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler 300C consumes 2.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler 300C could require 390 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 830 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 1110 km on highway | ||
| Audi A6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Audi A6) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Chrysler 300C) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.02 m | 4.93 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Chrysler 300C is larger. Chrysler 300C is 9 cm longer than the Audi A6, 2 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler 300C is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 504 litres | 546 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
504 litres | no data | |
|
Audi A6 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chrysler 300C has 42 litres less trunk space than the Audi A6. This could mean that the Chrysler 300C uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 12 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`170 | 2`150 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 3800 | 5800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.0/10 | 9.1/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 300C has
|
Audi A6 has
| |