Chrysler 300C 2004 vs Lexus LS 2006
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Petrol | 4.6 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 193 HP | 380 HP | |
| Torque: | 257 NM | 493 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 5.7 seconds | |
|
Lexus LS is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler 300C engine produces 187 HP less power than Lexus LS, whereas torque is 236 NM less than Lexus LS. Due to the lower power, Chrysler 300C reaches 100 km/h speed 5.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 | 11.1 | |
| Chrysler 300C consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Lexus LS, which means that by driving the Chrysler 300C over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 84 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| Lexus LS gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 143 mm (5.6 inches) | 145 mm (5.7 inches) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 560'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Lexus LS engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 20 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 7 other car models, including Chrysler 300M, Chrysler Sebring, Dodge Intrepid | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.02 m | 5.03 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chrysler 300C is 1 cm shorter than the Lexus LS, width is practically the same , while the height of Chrysler 300C is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 504 litres | 510 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
504 litres | no data | |
| Chrysler 300C has 6 litres less trunk space than the Lexus LS. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler 300C is 1 metres more than that of the Lexus LS, which means Chrysler 300C can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`170 | 2`465 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 8000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 300C has
|
Lexus LS has
| |