Chrysler 300C 2004 vs Chrysler Sebring 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.7 Petrol | 2.7 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 193 HP | 203 HP | |
| Torque: | 257 NM | 262 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Sebring is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler 300C engine produces 10 HP less power than Chrysler Sebring, whereas torque is 5 NM less than Chrysler Sebring. Due to the lower power, Chrysler 300C reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 | 10.2 | |
|
The Chrysler Sebring is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler 300C consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Sebring, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler 300C could require 120 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 820 km on highway | 730 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Chrysler Sebring) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Chrysler 300C) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 460'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 13 years | 13 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.02 m | 4.84 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Chrysler 300C is larger. Chrysler 300C is 18 cm longer than the Chrysler Sebring, 9 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler 300C is 9 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 504 litres | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
504 litres | no data | |
|
Chrysler 300C has more luggage capacity. Chrysler 300C has 49 litres more trunk space than the Chrysler Sebring. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.2 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler 300C is 0.8 metres more than that of the Chrysler Sebring, which means Chrysler 300C can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`170 | 1`990 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3600 | 1000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 300C has
|
Chrysler Sebring has
| |