Chrysler 300C 2004 vs Chrysler 300C 2005
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The wagon generally has more cargo space due to a larger trunk door opening, a roof that extends as far back as possible, and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into cargo space. Sedans tend to be quieter than wagons due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 5.7 Petrol | 5.7 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 340 HP | 340 HP | |
| Torque: | 525 NM | 525 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.4 seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Chrysler 300C 2004 and Chrysler 300C 2005 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 13.0 | 12.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 14.5 l/100km | 14.2 l/100km | |
|
By specification Chrysler 300C 2004 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler 300C 2005, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler 300C 2004 could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Chrysler 300C 2004 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler 300C 2005. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 71 litres | 71 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 540 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 710 km on highway | 690 km on highway | ||
| 480 km with real consumption | 500 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 520'000 km | 520'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 4 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.00 m | 5.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.51 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chrysler 300C 2004 is 2 cm shorter than the Chrysler 300C 2005, width is practically the same , while the height of Chrysler 300C 2004 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 630 litres | 504 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1602 litres | 504 litres | |
|
Chrysler 300C 2004 has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, The Chrysler 300C 2005 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler 300C 2004 (by 1098 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 12 meters | |
| Gross weight: | 2`425 kg | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 3200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.0/10 | 8.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 300C has
|
Chrysler 300C has
| |