Chrysler 300C 2004 vs Dodge Magnum 2003
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 5.7 Petrol | 5.7 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 340 HP | 345 HP | |
Torque: | 525 NM | 530 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.4 seconds | n/a seconds | |
Chrysler 300C engine produces 5 HP less power than Dodge Magnum, whereas torque is 5 NM less than Dodge Magnum. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 12.0 | no data | |
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 520'000 km | 520'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 4 years | 4 years | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.00 m | 5.02 m | |
Width: | 1.88 m | 1.88 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. Chrysler 300C is 2 cm shorter than the Dodge Magnum, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 630 litres | 2013 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1602 litres | no data | |
Dodge Magnum has more luggage space. Chrysler 300C has 1383 litres less trunk space than the Dodge Magnum. | |||
Turning diameter: | 12 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`330 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 4800 | 2200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Dodge Magnum has
| |