Chrysler 300C 2004 vs Dodge Magnum 2003
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.7 Petrol | 2.7 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 193 HP | 193 HP | |
Torque: | 257 NM | 258 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
Dodge Magnum is a more dynamic driving. Chrysler 300C and Dodge Magnum have the same engine power, but Chrysler 300C torque is 1 NM less than Dodge Magnum. Chrysler 300C reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 | 9.9 | |
Chrysler 300C consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Dodge Magnum, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler 300C could require 165 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 68 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
820 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 460'000 km | 460'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 13 years | 13 years | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.02 m | 5.02 m | |
Width: | 1.88 m | 1.88 m | |
Height: | 1.56 m | 1.48 m | |
Chrysler 300C is smaller, but higher. Chrysler 300C and Dodge Magnum are practically the same length. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 630 litres | 2013 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1602 litres | no data | |
Dodge Magnum has more luggage space. Chrysler 300C has 1383 litres less trunk space than the Dodge Magnum. | |||
Turning diameter: | 12 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | 2`225 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 4800 | 2200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
|
Dodge Magnum has
| |