Chrysler 300C 2015 vs Lexus ES 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 305 HP | 249 HP | |
| Torque: | 358 NM | 356 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 7.9 seconds | |
| Chrysler 300C engine produces 56 HP more power than Lexus ES, whereas torque is 2 NM more than Lexus ES. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 | 8.8 | |
|
The Lexus ES is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Chrysler 300C consumes 1.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Lexus ES, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler 300C could require 210 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 60 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Lexus ES) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Chrysler 300C) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.04 m | 4.98 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chrysler 300C is 7 cm longer than the Lexus ES, 4 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler 300C is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 462 litres | 472 litres | |
| Despite its longer length, Chrysler 300C has 10 litres less trunk space than the Lexus ES. This could mean that the Chrysler 300C uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`150 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 34 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 300C has
|
Lexus ES has
| |