Chrysler 300C 2015 vs Chevrolet Impala 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.6 Petrol | 3.6 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 305 HP | 309 HP | |
| Torque: | 358 NM | 358 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Chrysler 300C engine produces 4 HP less power than Chevrolet Impala, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | 10.7 | |
| Chrysler 300C consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Impala, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Chrysler 300C could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 860 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.04 m | 5.11 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.50 m | |
| Chrysler 300C is 7 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Impala, 5 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler 300C is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 462 litres | 532 litres | |
|
Chevrolet Impala has more luggage space. Chrysler 300C has 70 litres less trunk space than the Chevrolet Impala. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 300C has
|
Chevrolet Impala has
| |