Chrysler 300C 2004 vs Ford Mustang 2005
| Body: | Sedan | Coupe | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 4.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 253 HP | 212 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 325 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 7 seconds | |
| Chrysler 300C engine produces 41 HP more power than Ford Mustang, whereas torque is 15 NM more than Ford Mustang. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 10.4 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 61 litres | |
| 660 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.02 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Chrysler 300C is larger. Chrysler 300C is 26 cm longer than the Ford Mustang, width is practically the same , while the height of Chrysler 300C is 10 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 442 litres | 350 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
504 litres | no data | |
|
Chrysler 300C has more luggage capacity. Chrysler 300C has 92 litres more trunk space than the Ford Mustang. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 10 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 300C has
|
| |