Chrysler 300C 2004 vs Dodge Charger 2005
| Body: | Sedan | Coupe | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 3.5 Petrol | 3.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 253 HP | 253 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | n/a seconds | |
| Chrysler 300C and Dodge Charger have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 11.8 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 72 litres | 76 litres | |
| 660 km with real consumption | 580 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | 4x4 - AWD (all-wheel-drive) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.02 m | 5.08 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.48 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chrysler 300C is 6 cm shorter than the Dodge Charger, 1 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 442 litres | 456 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
504 litres | no data | |
| Chrysler 300C has 14 litres less trunk space than the Dodge Charger. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`185 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 6800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 300C has
|
| |