Chrysler 300C 2015 vs Audi A6 2025
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Chrysler 300C is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Audi A6 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Chrysler 300C also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 3.6 - 6.4 (petrol) | 2.0 - 3.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 286 - 476 HP | 204 - 367 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 - 637 NM | 340 - 580 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 4.7 - 8.2 seconds | |
| In general, Audi A6 are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Chrysler 300C. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 - 13.0 | 5.6 - 10.2 | |
|
Chrysler 300C petrol engines consumes on average 2.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Audi A6. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.05 m | 5.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Chrysler 300C is 6 cm longer than the Audi A6, 3 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler 300C is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 462 litres | 492 litres | |
|
Audi A6 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Chrysler 300C has 30 litres less trunk space than the Audi A6. This could mean that the Chrysler 300C uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12.4 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | ~ 2`620 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 300C has
|
Audi A6 has
| |