Chrysler 300C 2015 vs Volvo S90 2015
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chrysler 300C is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Volvo S90 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Chrysler 300C is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volvo S90 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Chrysler 300C also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 3.6 - 6.4 (petrol) | 2.0 (petrol, diesel, hybrid) | |
| Both cars are available with petrol engines. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 286 - 476 HP | 150 - 320 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 - 637 NM | 300 - 480 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | n/a seconds | 5.1 - 9.9 seconds | |
| In general, Volvo S90 are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Chrysler 300C. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.7 - 13.0 | 1.9 - 7.6 | |
|
Chrysler 300C petrol engines consumes on average 4 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo S90. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 120 - 140 mm (4.7 - 5.5 inches) | 152 mm (6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo S90 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.05 m | 4.96 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Chrysler 300C is larger. Chrysler 300C is 9 cm longer than the Volvo S90, 2 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler 300C is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 462 litres | 500 litres | |
|
Volvo S90 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Chrysler 300C uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 250 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler 300C is 238.6 metres less than that of the Volvo S90, which means Chrysler 300C can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | no data | ~ 2`393 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | no data | 19 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 300C has
|
Volvo S90 has
| |