Chrysler 300C 2011 vs Honda Accord 2011
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Chrysler 300C is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Honda Accord has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Chrysler 300C is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Honda Accord can be equipped only with front wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 3.0 - 6.4 | 2.2 - 3.5 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 239 - 470 HP | 150 - 281 HP | |
Torque: | 340 - 637 NM | 228 - 380 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.4 - 7.4 seconds | 7.2 - 10.1 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 - 12.6 | 5.3 - 9.4 | |
Chrysler 300C petrol engines consumes on average 3.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Honda Accord. On average, Chrysler 300C equipped with diesel engines consume 3.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Honda Accord. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.05 m | 4.82 m | |
Width: | 1.90 m | 1.85 m | |
Height: | 1.47 m | 1.46 m | |
Chrysler 300C is larger. Chrysler 300C is 23 cm longer than the Honda Accord, 5 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler 300C is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 462 litres | 467 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
465 litres | no data | |
Chrysler 300C has 5 litres less trunk space than the Honda Accord. | |||
Turning diameter: | no data | 12.1 meters | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`387 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | average | |
Average price (€): | 11 200 | 8400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 300C has
|
Honda Accord has
| |