Chrysler 300C 2011 vs BMW 5 series 2010
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chrysler 300C is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas BMW 5 series has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Engines: | 3.0 - 6.4 | 2.0 - 4.4 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 239 - 470 HP | 184 - 408 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 - 637 NM | 270 - 740 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.4 - 7.4 seconds | 4.7 - 8.2 seconds | |
| In general, BMW 5 series are available with more powerful and dynamic engines than Chrysler 300C. Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 - 12.6 | 4.5 - 11.0 | |
|
Chrysler 300C petrol engines consumes on average 3.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than BMW 5 series. On average, Chrysler 300C equipped with diesel engines consume 3.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 5 series. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 111 - 120 mm (4.4 - 4.7 inches) | 141 mm (5.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, BMW 5 series can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.05 m | 4.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.86 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Chrysler 300C is larger. Chrysler 300C is 15 cm longer than the BMW 5 series, 4 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 462 litres | 520 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
465 litres | no data | |
|
BMW 5 series has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Chrysler 300C uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 12 meters | |
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`387 kg | ~ 2`305 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`890 kg | ~ 1`699 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 497 kg | ~ 606 kg | |
| Chrysler 300C load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 22 procentiem less than BMW 5 series. Therefore, BMW 5 series is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 10 600 | 10 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 300C has
|
BMW 5 sērija has
| |