Chrysler 300C 2011 vs Lexus LS 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 3.0 - 6.4 | 4.6 - 5.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 239 - 470 HP | 370 - 394 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 - 637 NM | 473 - 520 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.4 - 7.4 seconds | 5.7 - 6.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 - 12.6 | 9.3 - 11.6 | |
|
Chrysler 300C petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Lexus LS. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.05 m | 5.16 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.47 m | |
| Chrysler 300C is 11 cm shorter than the Lexus LS, 3 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 462 litres | 510 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
465 litres | no data | |
|
Lexus LS has more luggage space. Chrysler 300C has 48 litres less trunk space than the Lexus LS. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`387 | ~ 2`582 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 26 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 300C has
|
Lexus LS has
| |