Chrysler 300C 2011 vs Jaguar XF 2011
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Chrysler 300C is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Jaguar XF can be equipped only with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 3.0 - 6.4 | 2.0 - 5.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 239 - 470 HP | 190 - 550 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 - 637 NM | 340 - 680 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.4 - 7.4 seconds | 5.1 - 8.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.5 - 12.6 | 5.2 - 12.5 | |
|
Chrysler 300C petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Jaguar XF. On average, Chrysler 300C equipped with diesel engines consume 3.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XF. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.05 m | 4.96 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.89 m | |
| Height: | 1.47 m | 1.46 m | |
|
Chrysler 300C is larger. Chrysler 300C is 9 cm longer than the Jaguar XF, 2 cm wider, while the height of Chrysler 300C is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 462 litres | 540 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
465 litres | no data | |
|
Jaguar XF has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the Chrysler 300C uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | no data | 11.5 meters | |
| Gross weight: | ~ 2`387 kg | ~ 2`328 kg | |
| Net weight: | ~ 1`890 kg | ~ 1`779 kg | |
| Load capacity: | ~ 497 kg | ~ 549 kg | |
| Chrysler 300C load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 10 procentiem less than Jaguar XF. Therefore, Jaguar XF is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 600 | 8600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 300C has
|
Jaguar XF has
| |