Chrysler 300C 2004 vs Ford Mustang 2005
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Body: | Sedan | Coupe | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
Chrysler 300C is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas Ford Mustang has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Chrysler 300C is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Ford Mustang can be equipped only with rear wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 2.7 - 6.1 (petrol, diesel) | 4.0 - 5.4 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 193 - 425 HP | 212 - 540 HP | |
Torque: | 257 - 570 NM | 325 - 691 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5 - 11 seconds | 4.5 - 7 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.1 - 14.0 | 10.4 - 13.0 | |
Chrysler 300C petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than Ford Mustang. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.02 m | 4.77 m | |
Width: | 1.88 m | 1.88 m | |
Height: | 1.48 m | 1.39 m | |
Chrysler 300C is larger. Chrysler 300C is 25 cm longer than the Ford Mustang, width is practically the same , while the height of Chrysler 300C is 9 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 504 litres | 350 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
504 litres | no data | |
Chrysler 300C has more luggage capacity. Chrysler 300C has 154 litres more trunk space than the Ford Mustang. | |||
Turning diameter: | 12 meters | no data | |
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`269 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 3800 | 10 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 300C has
|
Ford Mustang has
| |