Chrysler 300C 2004 vs Dodge Magnum 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.7 - 6.1 (petrol, diesel) | 2.7 - 6.0 (petrol) | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 193 - 425 HP | 193 - 425 HP | |
| Torque: | 257 - 570 NM | 258 - 570 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5 - 11 seconds | 5 - 10.7 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 - 14.0 | 9.9 - 14.6 | |
|
Chrysler 300C petrol engines consumes on average 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Dodge Magnum. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.01 m | 5.02 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Chrysler 300C is smaller, but higher. Chrysler 300C is 1 cm shorter than the Dodge Magnum, width is practically the same , while the height of Chrysler 300C is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 630 litres | 2013 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1602 litres | no data | |
|
Dodge Magnum has more luggage space. Chrysler 300C has 1383 litres less trunk space than the Dodge Magnum. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Chrysler 300C is 1.7 metres more than that of the Dodge Magnum, which means Chrysler 300C can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`334 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 2200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 300C has
|
Dodge Magnum has
| |