Chrysler 300C 2004 vs BMW X5 2003
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Estate car / wagon | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Chrysler 300C is available only with automatic gearbox, whereas BMW X5 has both automatic and manual transmission options. | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| Chrysler 300C is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while BMW X5 can be equipped only with four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, Chrysler 300C also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.7 - 6.1 | 3.0 - 4.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 193 - 425 HP | 218 - 360 HP | |
| Torque: | 257 - 570 NM | 300 - 500 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5 - 11 seconds | 6.1 - 8.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 - 14.0 | 8.6 - 14.0 | |
|
Chrysler 300C petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than BMW X5. On average, Chrysler 300C equipped with diesel engines consume 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.01 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.88 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.53 m | 1.72 m | |
|
Chrysler 300C is larger, but lower. Chrysler 300C is 34 cm longer than the BMW X5, width is practically the same , while the height of Chrysler 300C is 19 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 630 litres | 465 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1602 litres | 1550 litres | |
|
Chrysler 300C has more luggage capacity. Chrysler 300C has 165 litres more trunk space than the BMW X5. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Chrysler 300C (by 52 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 12 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`334 | ~ 2`666 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 4800 | 5400 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.0/10 | 8.5/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Chrysler 300C has
|
BMW X5 has
| |