BMW 7 series 2015 vs Jaguar XF 2015
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 265 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 620 NM | 430 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.9 seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
|
BMW 7 series is more dynamic to drive. BMW 7 series engine produces 85 HP more power than Jaguar XF, whereas torque is 190 NM more than Jaguar XF. Thanks to more power BMW 7 series reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 | 4.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
|
The Jaguar XF is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW 7 series consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XF, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW 7 series could require 135 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW 7 series consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XF. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 78 litres | 66 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1500 km in combined cycle | 1530 km in combined cycle | |
| 1690 km on highway | 1730 km on highway | ||
| 1050 km with real consumption | 1000 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 135 mm (5.3 inches) | 116 mm (4.6 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, BMW 7 series can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a BMW 7 series engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 11 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW X5, BMW X3, BMW X6, BMW 6 sērija | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Land Rover Discovery Sport, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, Jaguar XE | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| Jaguar XF 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Jaguar XF 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.24 m | 4.95 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.99 m | |
| Height: | 1.49 m | 1.46 m | |
| BMW 7 series is 28 cm longer than the Jaguar XF, 9 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 7 series is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 515 litres | 540 litres | |
|
Jaguar XF has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, This could mean that the BMW 7 series uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.5 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW 7 series is 0.9 metres more than that of the Jaguar XF, which means BMW 7 series can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`540 kg | 2`250 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`825 kg | 1`659 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 715 kg | 591 kg | |
| BMW 7 series load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 17 procentiem more than Jaguar XF. Therefore, BMW 7 series is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 37 400 | 17 200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW 7 sērija has
|
Jaguar XF has
| |