BMW 7 series 2012 vs Jaguar XF 2015
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 258 HP | 180 HP | |
Torque: | 560 NM | 430 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6 seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
BMW 7 series is more dynamic to drive. BMW 7 series engine produces 78 HP more power than Jaguar XF, whereas torque is 130 NM more than Jaguar XF. Thanks to more power BMW 7 series reaches 100 km/h speed 2.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.0 | 4.3 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.1 l/100km | 6.6 l/100km | |
The Jaguar XF is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW 7 series consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XF, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW 7 series could require 255 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW 7 series consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XF. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 350'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a BMW 7 series engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 17 years | 10 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW X3, BMW X6 | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including Land Rover Discovery Sport, Land Rover Range Rover Evoque, Jaguar XE | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW 7 series might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
BMW 7 sērija 2012 3.0 engine: The N57 engine is a robust turbo diesel unit without any major systemic issues. Its longevity depends heavily on regular maintenance, including timely servicing, periodic cleaning of the intake system, and active regeneration of the diesel particulate filter.
The ... More about BMW 7 sērija 2012 3.0 engine Jaguar XF 2015 2.0 engine: This engine is known for its relatively limited lifespan. In early production models, balance shaft bearings wore out quickly and started making noise. The chain-driven timing system, located on the flywheel ... More about Jaguar XF 2015 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 5.08 m | 4.95 m | |
Width: | 1.90 m | 1.99 m | |
Height: | 1.47 m | 1.46 m | |
BMW 7 series is 13 cm longer than the Jaguar XF, 9 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 7 series is 1 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 540 litres | |
Jaguar XF has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, BMW 7 series has 40 litres less trunk space than the Jaguar XF. This could mean that the BMW 7 series uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 12.2 meters | 11.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the BMW 7 series is 0.6 metres more than that of the Jaguar XF, which means BMW 7 series can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`550 | 2`250 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 17 000 | 21 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
BMW 7 sērija has
|
Jaguar XF has
| |