BMW 7 series 1998 vs Chrysler 300M 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.9 Diesel | 3.5 Petrol | |
| Diesel (BMW 7 series) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Chrysler 300M) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 HP | 254 HP | |
| Torque: | 410 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 8.8 seconds | |
|
Chrysler 300M is a more dynamic driving. BMW 7 series engine produces 70 HP less power than Chrysler 300M, but torque is 70 NM more than Chrysler 300M. Due to the lower power, BMW 7 series reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.7 | 10.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 11.3 l/100km | |
|
The BMW 7 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW 7 series consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler 300M, which means that by driving the BMW 7 series over 15,000 km in a year you can save 300 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW 7 series consumes 3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler 300M. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 85 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 970 km in combined cycle | 590 km in combined cycle | |
| 1250 km on highway | 750 km on highway | ||
| 1020 km with real consumption | 560 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW 7 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Chrysler 300M) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 7 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| BMW 7 sērija 1998 2.9 engine: Overall, the M57 diesel engine is known for its high reliability and can deliver an exceptionally long service life when properly maintained with high-quality fuel and oil. Fuel quality is especially critical ... More about BMW 7 sērija 1998 2.9 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.98 m | 5.00 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.92 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.42 m | |
|
BMW 7 series is smaller, but slightly higher. BMW 7 series is 2 cm shorter than the Chrysler 300M, 6 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 7 series is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 530 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 530 litres | |
|
Chrysler 300M has more luggage space. BMW 7 series has 30 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler 300M. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW 7 series is 0.5 metres more than that of the Chrysler 300M, which means BMW 7 series can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`365 | 2`120 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 3200 | 1600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 5.8/10 | 9.6/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW 7 sērija has
|
Chrysler 300M has
| |