BMW 5 series 2013 vs BMW X5 2010
Body: | Sedan | Crossover / SUV | |
---|---|---|---|
Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 306 HP | 306 HP | |
Torque: | 400 NM | 400 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.6 seconds | 6.8 seconds | |
BMW 5 series and BMW X5 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. BMW 5 series reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 10.1 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 10.6 l/100km | 12.4 l/100km | |
The BMW 5 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW 5 series consumes 2.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5, which means that by driving the BMW 5 series over 15,000 km in a year you can save 375 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW 5 series consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 85 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
1180 km on highway | 1020 km on highway | ||
660 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Ground clearance: | 141 mm (5.6 inches) | 222 mm (8.7 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, BMW X5 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 420'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 9 years | 9 years | |
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.91 m | 4.86 m | |
Width: | 1.86 m | 1.93 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.78 m | |
BMW 5 series is 5 cm longer than the BMW X5, 7 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 5 series is 31 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 520 litres | 620 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1750 litres | |
BMW X5 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, BMW 5 series has 100 litres less trunk space than the BMW X5. This could mean that the BMW 5 series uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 12.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the BMW 5 series is 0.7 metres less than that of the BMW X5, which means BMW 5 series can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`365 | 2`750 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | low | average | |
BMW X5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW 5 series has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than BMW X5, so BMW X5 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 17 800 | 14 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
BMW 5 sērija has
|
BMW X5 has
| |