BMW 5 series 2013 vs BMW X5 2010
Body: | Sedan | Crossover / SUV | |
---|---|---|---|
Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 313 HP | 245 HP | |
Torque: | 630 NM | 540 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.1 seconds | 7.6 seconds | |
BMW 5 series is more dynamic to drive. BMW 5 series engine produces 68 HP more power than BMW X5, whereas torque is 90 NM more than BMW X5. Thanks to more power BMW 5 series reaches 100 km/h speed 2.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 7.4 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.6 l/100km | 9.6 l/100km | |
The BMW 5 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW 5 series consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5, which means that by driving the BMW 5 series over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW 5 series consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the BMW X5. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 85 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1250 km in combined cycle | 1140 km in combined cycle | |
1420 km on highway | 1260 km on highway | ||
810 km with real consumption | 880 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Ground clearance: | 141 mm (5.6 inches) | 222 mm (8.7 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, BMW X5 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a BMW X5 engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 16 years | 16 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including BMW 3 sērija, BMW X5, BMW 7 sērija, BMW X3, BMW X6 | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW 7 sērija, BMW X6 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW 5 series might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.91 m | 4.86 m | |
Width: | 1.86 m | 1.93 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.78 m | |
BMW 5 series is 5 cm longer than the BMW X5, 7 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 5 series is 31 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 520 litres | 620 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1750 litres | |
BMW X5 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, BMW 5 series has 100 litres less trunk space than the BMW X5. This could mean that the BMW 5 series uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 12.1 meters | 12.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the BMW 5 series is 0.7 metres less than that of the BMW X5, which means BMW 5 series can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`440 | 2`755 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | low | average | |
BMW X5 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW 5 series has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than BMW X5, so BMW X5 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 17 800 | 14 800 | |
Pros and Cons: |
BMW 5 sērija has
|
BMW X5 has
| |