BMW 5 series 2010 vs Chevrolet Malibu 2013
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 258 HP | 197 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 259 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.7 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
BMW 5 series is more dynamic to drive. BMW 5 series engine produces 61 HP more power than Chevrolet Malibu, whereas torque is 51 NM more than Chevrolet Malibu. Thanks to more power BMW 5 series reaches 100 km/h speed 2.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.6 | 8.8 | |
|
The BMW 5 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. BMW 5 series consumes 1.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Malibu, which means that by driving the BMW 5 series over 15,000 km in a year you can save 180 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 73 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
| 1160 km on highway | 1050 km on highway | ||
| BMW 5 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Chevrolet Malibu) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 5 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Chevrolet Malibu engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 7 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including BMW 3 sērija, BMW 6 sērija | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
| BMW 5 sērija 2010 3.0 engine: Relatively reliable engine. Most of the problems are related to the fuel injection system, spark plugs and coils, and the Vanos phase control system. Problems with the high-pressure fuel pump were common in ... More about BMW 5 sērija 2010 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.90 m | 4.86 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. BMW 5 series is 4 cm longer than the Chevrolet Malibu, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 520 litres | 461 litres | |
|
BMW 5 series has more luggage capacity. BMW 5 series has 59 litres more trunk space than the Chevrolet Malibu. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`265 | 2`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 12 200 | 7600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW 5 sērija has
|
Chevrolet Malibu has
| |