BMW 5 series 2010 vs Jaguar XF 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 3.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 HP | 275 HP | |
| Torque: | 450 NM | 600 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.2 seconds | 6.4 seconds | |
|
Jaguar XF is a more dynamic driving. BMW 5 series engine produces 71 HP less power than Jaguar XF, whereas torque is 150 NM less than Jaguar XF. Due to the lower power, BMW 5 series reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.1 | 6.8 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 8.4 l/100km | |
|
The BMW 5 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW 5 series consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XF, which means that by driving the BMW 5 series over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW 5 series consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Jaguar XF. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1140 km in combined cycle | 1020 km in combined cycle | |
| 1370 km on highway | 1270 km on highway | ||
| 940 km with real consumption | 830 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW 5 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 390'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 18 years | 17 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including BMW 3 sērija, BMW X5, BMW 7 sērija, BMW X6 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Jaguar XJ, Jaguar F-Pace | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW 5 series might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| BMW 5 sērija 2010 3.0 engine: The N57 engine is a robust turbo diesel unit without any major systemic issues. Its longevity depends heavily on regular maintenance, including timely servicing, periodic cleaning of the intake system, and active regeneration of the diesel particulate filter.
The ... More about BMW 5 sērija 2010 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.90 m | 4.96 m | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | 2.05 m | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | 1.46 m | |
|
BMW 5 series is smaller, but slightly higher. BMW 5 series is 6 cm shorter than the Jaguar XF, 19 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 520 litres | 500 litres | |
| Even though the car is shorter, The Jaguar XF may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.9 meters | 11.48 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW 5 series is 0.42 metres more than that of the Jaguar XF, which means BMW 5 series can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`315 kg | 2`360 kg | |
| Safety: | |||
| BMW 5 series scores higher in safety tests, but Jaguar XF is better rated in child safety tests. The BMW 5 series scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 10 200 | 5400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW 5 sērija has
|
Jaguar XF has
| |