BMW 5 series 2003 vs Skoda Superb 2003
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 218 HP | 163 HP | |
Torque: | 500 NM | 350 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.3 seconds | 10.4 seconds | |
BMW 5 series is more dynamic to drive. BMW 5 series engine produces 55 HP more power than Skoda Superb, whereas torque is 150 NM more than Skoda Superb. Thanks to more power BMW 5 series reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 7.7 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.8 l/100km | 7.6 l/100km | |
The Skoda Superb is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW 5 series consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW 5 series could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW 5 series consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 62 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 890 km in combined cycle | 800 km in combined cycle | |
1110 km on highway | 1080 km on highway | ||
790 km with real consumption | 810 km with real consumption | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Front-wheel drive cars (Skoda Superb) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 5 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 440'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a BMW 5 series engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 3 years | 5 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including BMW 3 sērija, BMW X5, BMW X3 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Audi A4 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW 5 series might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
BMW 5 sērija 2003 3.0 engine: The BMW M57 engine is regarded as one of the best German-built power units. Its inline-six layout is praised for reliability, and cars equipped with this engine are often more desirable on the used market. Despite delivering ... More about BMW 5 sērija 2003 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.84 m | 4.80 m | |
Width: | 1.85 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.47 m | 1.47 m | |
BMW 5 series is larger. BMW 5 series is 4 cm longer than the Skoda Superb, 9 cm wider the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 520 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the BMW 5 series is 0.8 metres less than that of the Skoda Superb, which means BMW 5 series can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`170 | 1`600 | |
Safety: | |||
Quality: | average | average | |
BMW 5 series has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Skoda Superb, so BMW 5 series quality could be a bit better. | |||
Average price (€): | 4200 | 1800 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.3/10 | 9.0/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
BMW 5 sērija has
|
Skoda Superb has
| |