BMW 5 series 1986 vs Mitsubishi Pajero 1991
| Body: | Sedan | Crossover / SUV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Crossovers and SUVs have better off-road capabilities (higher ground clearance, can have 4x4 drive), they are preferable for driving on unpaved roads and rural areas. Also, the driver's seating position is higher in a crossover or SUVs, which provides better visibility also in city. This usually comes at the cost of higher fuel consumption, increased weight and higher maintenance costs. | |||
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.7 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 129 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 230 NM | 236 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | 14 seconds | |
| BMW 5 series engine produces 21 HP less power than Mitsubishi Pajero, whereas torque is 6 NM less than Mitsubishi Pajero. Despite less power, BMW 5 series reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 | 14.0 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.7 l/100km | 17.4 l/100km | |
|
The BMW 5 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW 5 series consumes 5.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means that by driving the BMW 5 series over 15,000 km in a year you can save 780 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW 5 series consumes 6.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Pajero. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 92 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 790 km in combined cycle | 650 km in combined cycle | |
| 650 km with real consumption | 520 km with real consumption | ||
| BMW 5 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 15 years | 32 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on BMW 3 sērija | Used also on Dodge Grand Caravan | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Pajero might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | no | yes | |
| The Mitsubishi Pajero engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.62 m | 4.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.70 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.87 m | |
|
BMW 5 series is smaller. BMW 5 series is 10 cm shorter than the Mitsubishi Pajero, 8 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 5 series is 45 cm lower. | |||
| Seats: | no data | 7 seats | |
| Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 1080 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 7 seats: | no data | 1080 litres | |
| Trunk capacity with 5 seats: | 460 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2050 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW 5 series is 0.8 metres less than that of the Mitsubishi Pajero, which means BMW 5 series can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 3`300 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 4200 | 3600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW 5 sērija has
|
Mitsubishi Pajero has
| |