BMW 5 series 2013 vs Volvo V90 2016
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 313 HP | 190 HP | |
Torque: | 630 NM | 400 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.4 seconds | 8.5 seconds | |
BMW 5 series is more dynamic to drive. BMW 5 series engine produces 123 HP more power than Volvo V90, whereas torque is 230 NM more than Volvo V90. Thanks to more power BMW 5 series reaches 100 km/h speed 3.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.5 | 4.5 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 6.3 l/100km | |
The Volvo V90 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW 5 series consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V90, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW 5 series could require 150 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW 5 series consumes 2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V90. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 55 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 1270 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
1420 km on highway | 1340 km on highway | ||
840 km with real consumption | 870 km with real consumption | ||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Front-wheel drive cars (Volvo V90) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 5 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Ground clearance: | 141 mm (5.6 inches) | 153 mm (6 inches) | |
Because of the higher ground clearance, Volvo V90 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Volvo V90 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. Choose from six 4x4 versions of Volvo V90 2016 if off-road driveability is important to you. | |||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 380'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 17 years | 11 years | |
Engine spread: | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including BMW 3 sērija, BMW X5, BMW 7 sērija, BMW X3, BMW X6 | Installed on at least 8 other car models, including Volvo V40, Volvo XC60, Volvo V60, Volvo V40 Cross Country, Volvo S90 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW 5 series might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
The BMW 5 series engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
BMW 5 sērija 2013 3.0 engine: The N57 engine is a robust turbo diesel unit without any major systemic issues. Its longevity depends heavily on regular maintenance, including timely servicing, periodic cleaning of the intake system, and active regeneration of the diesel particulate filter.
The ... More about BMW 5 sērija 2013 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.91 m | 4.94 m | |
Width: | 1.86 m | 1.89 m | |
Height: | 1.46 m | 1.48 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. BMW 5 series is 3 cm shorter than the Volvo V90, 3 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 5 series is 1 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 560 litres | 560 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1670 litres | 1526 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the BMW 5 series is 0.6 metres more than that of the Volvo V90, which means BMW 5 series can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`500 | 2`310 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | below average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 14 000 | 19 000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
BMW 5 sērija has
|
Volvo V90 has
| |