BMW 5 series 2004 vs Volvo XC70 2005
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.5 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 177 HP | 185 HP | |
Torque: | 400 NM | 400 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 10 seconds | |
BMW 5 series engine produces 8 HP less power than Volvo XC70, the torque is the same for both cars. Despite less power, BMW 5 series reaches 100 km/h speed 1.5 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.0 | 8.5 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 8.3 l/100km | 8.8 l/100km | |
The BMW 5 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW 5 series consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC70, which means that by driving the BMW 5 series over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW 5 series consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo XC70. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
1070 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
840 km with real consumption | 790 km with real consumption | ||
BMW 5 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 480'000 km | 480'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 12 years | 5 years | |
Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S80, Volvo S60, Volvo XC90, Volvo XC60 | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
BMW 5 sērija 2004 2.5 engine: Overall, the M57 diesel engine is known for its high reliability and can deliver an exceptionally long service life when properly maintained with high-quality fuel and oil. Fuel quality is especially critical ... More about BMW 5 sērija 2004 2.5 engine Volvo XC70 2005 2.4 engine: The early versions of these engines are known for their reliability and rare failures, which made them popular. However, engine have several common weaknesses. Intake manifold swirl flaps often seize, and ... More about Volvo XC70 2005 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.84 m | 4.73 m | |
Width: | 1.85 m | 1.86 m | |
Height: | 1.49 m | 1.56 m | |
BMW 5 series is 11 cm longer than the Volvo XC70, 1 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 5 series is 7 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 500 litres | 485 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1650 litres | 1641 litres | |
BMW 5 series has 15 litres more trunk space than the Volvo XC70. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW 5 series (by 9 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the BMW 5 series is 0.6 metres less than that of the Volvo XC70, which means BMW 5 series can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`285 | 2`220 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | average | below average | |
BMW 5 series has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo XC70 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than BMW 5 series, so BMW 5 series quality is probably slightly better | |||
Average price (€): | 4000 | 3600 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 8.3/10 | 8.0/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
BMW 5 sērija has
|
Volvo XC70 has
| |