BMW 5 series 2000 vs Subaru Outback 1998
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 231 HP | 209 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 282 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.7 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
BMW 5 series is more dynamic to drive. BMW 5 series engine produces 22 HP more power than Subaru Outback, whereas torque is 18 NM more than Subaru Outback. Thanks to more power BMW 5 series reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.0 | 10.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.0 l/100km | 10.5 l/100km | |
|
By specification BMW 5 series consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Outback, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW 5 series could require 75 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW 5 series consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Subaru Outback. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 70 litres | 64 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 600 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 600 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.80 m | 4.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.80 m | 1.74 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.58 m | |
|
BMW 5 series is larger, but lower. BMW 5 series is 8 cm longer than the Subaru Outback, 6 cm wider, while the height of BMW 5 series is 14 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 410 litres | 527 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1525 litres | 1649 litres | |
|
Subaru Outback has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, BMW 5 series has 117 litres less trunk space than the Subaru Outback. This could mean that the BMW 5 series uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Subaru Outback (by 124 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`275 | 2`085 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW 5 sērija has
|
Subaru Outback has
| |
