BMW 5 series 1992 vs Volvo 960 1990

 
BMW 5 series
1992 - 1997
Volvo 960
1990 - 1991
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.5 Diesel2.4 Diesel

Performance

Power: 143 HP115 HP
Torque: 260 NM225 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.6 secondsn/a seconds
BMW 5 series engine produces 28 HP more power than Volvo 960, whereas torque is 35 NM more than Volvo 960.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.08.5
The BMW 5 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
BMW 5 series consumes 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 960, which means that by driving the BMW 5 series over 15,000 km in a year you can save 75 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 80 litres80 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1000 km in combined cycle940 km in combined cycle
1310 km on highway1140 km on highway
BMW 5 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.72 m4.85 m
Width: 1.75 m1.75 m
Height: 1.42 m1.44 m
BMW 5 series is 13 cm shorter than the Volvo 960, width is practically the same , while the height of BMW 5 series is 2 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 460 litres992 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
910 litres2125 litres
Volvo 960 has more luggage space.
BMW 5 series has 532 litres less trunk space than the Volvo 960. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo 960 (by 1215 litres).
Turning diameter: 11 meters9.9 meters
The turning circle of the BMW 5 series is 1.1 metres more than that of the Volvo 960, which means BMW 5 series can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`1102`065
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
average
no data
Average price (€): 26003000
Pros and Cons: BMW 5 sērija has
  • more power
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Volvo 960 has
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv