BMW 5 series 1992 vs Volvo V90 1997
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.9 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 192 HP | 180 HP | |
Torque: | 250 NM | 260 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.2 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
BMW 5 series engine produces 12 HP more power than Volvo V90, but torque is 10 NM less than Volvo V90. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 | 11.0 | |
The BMW 5 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. BMW 5 series consumes 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V90, which means that by driving the BMW 5 series over 15,000 km in a year you can save 120 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 780 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
1080 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
BMW 5 series gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.72 m | 4.86 m | |
Width: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.45 m | |
BMW 5 series is 14 cm shorter than the Volvo V90, width is practically the same , while the height of BMW 5 series is 3 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 602 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
910 litres | 1702 litres | |
Volvo V90 has more luggage space. BMW 5 series has 142 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V90. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo V90 (by 792 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 9.7 meters | |
The turning circle of the BMW 5 series is 1.3 metres more than that of the Volvo V90, which means BMW 5 series can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`125 | 2`100 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 2600 | 2200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
BMW 5 sērija has
|
Volvo V90 has
| |