BMW 5 series 1992 vs Volvo 960 1990
Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 190 HP | |
Torque: | 190 NM | 280 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 12.4 seconds | n/a seconds | |
BMW 5 series engine produces 40 HP less power than Volvo 960, whereas torque is 90 NM less than Volvo 960. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.8 | 11.2 | |
BMW 5 series consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo 960, which means that by driving the BMW 5 series over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 80 litres | 80 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
1010 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.72 m | 4.85 m | |
Width: | 1.75 m | 1.75 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.44 m | |
BMW 5 series is 13 cm shorter than the Volvo 960, width is practically the same , while the height of BMW 5 series is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 460 litres | 992 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 2125 litres | |
Volvo 960 has more luggage space. BMW 5 series has 532 litres less trunk space than the Volvo 960. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 9.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the BMW 5 series is 1.1 metres more than that of the Volvo 960, which means BMW 5 series can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`100 | no data | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 2600 | 3000 | |
Pros and Cons: |
BMW 5 sērija has
|
Volvo 960 has
| |