BMW 5 series 2024 vs Skoda Superb 2023
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Hybrid | 1.5 Hybrid | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 190 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.4 seconds | 8.1 seconds | |
|
BMW 5 series is more dynamic to drive. BMW 5 series engine produces 40 HP more power than Skoda Superb, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Skoda Superb. Thanks to more power BMW 5 series reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 0.9 | 0.5 | |
|
The Skoda Superb is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. BMW 5 series consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Skoda Superb, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW 5 series could require 60 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 60 litres | 45 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | no data | 9000 km in combined cycle | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Skoda Superb) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 5 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 147 mm (5.8 inches) | 140 mm (5.5 inches) | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 5.06 m | 4.90 m | |
| Width: | 1.90 m | 1.85 m | |
| Height: | 1.52 m | 1.48 m | |
|
BMW 5 series is larger. BMW 5 series is 16 cm longer than the Skoda Superb, 5 cm wider, while the height of BMW 5 series is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 570 litres | 510 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1700 litres | 1770 litres | |
| BMW 5 series has 60 litres more trunk space than the Skoda Superb. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Skoda Superb (by 70 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.3 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW 5 series is 1.2 metres more than that of the Skoda Superb, which means BMW 5 series can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`740 kg | 2`350 kg | |
| Net weight: | 2`065 kg | 1`778 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 675 kg | 572 kg | |
| BMW 5 series load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 15 procentiem more than Skoda Superb. Therefore, BMW 5 series is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 61 400 | no data | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW 5 sērija has
|
Skoda Superb has
| |
