BMW 5 series 2020 vs Volkswagen Arteon 2020
| Comparing electrical vehicle (EV) with combustion engine (ICE) one is a complex task, but we are doing our best. | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 1.4 Hybrid | |
| Petrol engines (BMW 5 series) are generally cheaper to purchase and maintain, with simpler mechanics and consistent highway performance. Hybrid (Volkswagen Arteon) engines, on the other hand, provide significantly better fuel efficiency and lower emissions, especially in urban and stop-and-go traffic conditions. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 184 HP | 156 HP | |
| Torque: | 290 NM | 250 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.3 seconds | 7.8 seconds | |
| BMW 5 series engine produces 28 HP more power than Volkswagen Arteon, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Volkswagen Arteon. Despite the higher power, BMW 5 series reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Consumption: | 5.7 l/100km | 1.2 l/100km + 13.1 kWh/100km | |
| Fuel cost per 100km: | 11.80 $ | 6.90 $ | |
|
Change fuel prices per unit to adjust the calculation to the fuel prices in your country. Petrol$/lElectricity$/kWh | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1190 km in combined cycle | no data | |
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Volkswagen Arteon) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 5 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
| Ground clearance: | 140 mm (5.5 inches) | 138 mm (5.4 inches) | |
| BMW 5 sērija 2020 2.0 engine: Compared to their predecessors, B48 engines are more robust and less prone to major failures. They are well-suited for chip tuning, which can noticeably enhance performance and responsiveness without ... More about BMW 5 sērija 2020 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.96 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.87 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.46 m | |
| BMW 5 series is 10 cm longer than the Volkswagen Arteon, width is practically the same , while the height of BMW 5 series is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 560 litres | 455 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1700 litres | 1632 litres | |
|
BMW 5 series has more luggage capacity. BMW 5 series has 105 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Arteon. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW 5 series (by 68 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12 meters | 11.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW 5 series is 0.1 metres more than that of the Volkswagen Arteon. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`410 kg | 2`290 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`715 kg | 1`739 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 695 kg | 551 kg | |
| BMW 5 series load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 21 procentiem more than Volkswagen Arteon. Therefore, BMW 5 series is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 32 400 | 24 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW 5 sērija has
|
Volkswagen Arteon has
| |