BMW 5 series 2016 vs Mazda 6 2018
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 3.0 Diesel | 2.2 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 265 HP | 184 HP | |
| Torque: | 620 NM | 445 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 5.4 seconds | 9 seconds | |
|
BMW 5 series is more dynamic to drive. BMW 5 series engine produces 81 HP more power than Mazda 6, whereas torque is 175 NM more than Mazda 6. Thanks to more power BMW 5 series reaches 100 km/h speed 3.6 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 5.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.4 l/100km | 6.7 l/100km | |
|
The Mazda 6 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW 5 series consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW 5 series could require 165 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW 5 series consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1060 km in combined cycle | 1210 km in combined cycle | |
| 890 km with real consumption | 920 km with real consumption | ||
| Mazda 6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Ground clearance: | 139 mm (5.5 inches) | 165 mm (6.5 inches) | |
| Because of the higher ground clearance, Mazda 6 can perform better on bad roads - it can go over higher obstacles and bumps. At the same time, the higher ground clearance can reduce stability and handling on paved roads, especially at higher speeds. Note, however, that this Mazda 6 version does not have 4x4 drive, which is very important in poor road conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 350'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a BMW 5 series engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 10 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW X5, BMW 7 sērija, BMW X3, BMW X6, BMW 6 sērija | Used also on Mazda CX-5 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW 5 series might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.94 m | 4.87 m | |
| Width: | 1.87 m | 1.84 m | |
| Height: | 1.48 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. BMW 5 series is 7 cm longer than the Mazda 6, 3 cm wider, while the height of BMW 5 series is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 530 litres | 489 litres | |
|
BMW 5 series has more luggage capacity. BMW 5 series has 41 litres more trunk space than the Mazda 6. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.05 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW 5 series is 0.050000000000001 metres more than that of the Mazda 6. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`385 | 2`200 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Mazda 6 is better rated in child safety tests. The Mazda 6 scores higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
| Quality: | low | low | |
| Mazda 6 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW 5 series has serious deffects in 20 percent more cases than Mazda 6, so Mazda 6 quality is probably better | |||
| Average price (€): | 25 200 | 24 000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW 5 sērija has
|
Mazda 6 has
| |