BMW 5 series 2013 vs Volkswagen Passat CC 2012
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4) | |
| BMW 5 series is available with rear wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Volkswagen Passat CC can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive. All-wheel drive models tend to consume more fuel, so if you don't need off road capabilities, BMW 5 series also offers 2-wheel drive versions for fuel economy. 2WD versions also have lower maintenance costs. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 4.4 | 1.8 - 3.6 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 - 560 HP | 152 - 300 HP | |
| Torque: | 270 - 740 NM | 250 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 4.4 - 9.7 seconds | 5.5 - 8.6 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 - 9.9 | 5.5 - 9.3 | |
|
BMW 5 series petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volkswagen Passat CC. On average, BMW 5 series equipped with diesel engines consume 0.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Passat CC. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.91 m | no data | |
| Width: | 1.86 m | no data | |
| Height: | 1.46 m | no data | |
| Trunk capacity: | 520 litres | 532 litres | |
| BMW 5 series has 12 litres less trunk space than the Volkswagen Passat CC. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 12.6 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`309 | ~ 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | below average | low | |
| Average price (€): | 15 200 | 15 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW 5 sērija has
|
| |