BMW 5 series 1981 vs Mazda 3 2003

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
BMW 5 series
1981 - 1988
Mazda 3
2003 - 2006
Body: SedanHatchback
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Rear wheel drive (RWD)Front wheel drive (FWD)
BMW 5 series is available with rear wheel drive, while Mazda 3 can be equipped with front wheel drive.
Engines: 1.8 - 3.41.3 - 2.3

Performance

Power: 86 - 218 HP84 - 160 HP
Torque: 140 - 310 NM122 - 245 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.2 - 18 seconds9 - 14.3 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.1 - 11.05.0 - 8.2
BMW 5 series petrol engines consumes on average 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 3. On average, BMW 5 series equipped with diesel engines consume 2.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 3.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.62 m4.45 m
Width: 1.70 m1.76 m
Height: 1.42 m1.46 m
BMW 5 series is 17 cm longer than the Mazda 3, 6 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 5 series is 4 cm lower.
Trunk capacity: 460 litres481 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data878 litres
Mazda 3 has more luggage space.
Despite its longer length, BMW 5 series has 21 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 3. This could mean that the BMW 5 series uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable.
Turning diameter: 11 meters10.3 meters
The turning circle of the BMW 5 series is 0.7 metres more than that of the Mazda 3, which means BMW 5 series can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`798~ 1`728
Safety: no datano data
Quality: no data
high
Average price (€): 42001200
Pros and Cons:
    Mazda 3 has
    • lower fuel consumption
    • better manoeuvrability
    • lower price
    Share these results to social networks or e-mail
    Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv