BMW 1 series 2008 vs Volkswagen Scirocco 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 204 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 400 NM | 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.1 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
|
BMW 1 series is more dynamic to drive. BMW 1 series engine produces 64 HP more power than Volkswagen Scirocco, whereas torque is 80 NM more than Volkswagen Scirocco. Thanks to more power BMW 1 series reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 5.5 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 7.5 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
The Volkswagen Scirocco is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW 1 series consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Scirocco, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW 1 series could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW 1 series consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volkswagen Scirocco. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 910 km in combined cycle | 900 km in combined cycle | |
| 1100 km on highway | 1080 km on highway | ||
| 680 km with real consumption | 780 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Volkswagen Scirocco) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 1 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 390'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volkswagen Scirocco engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on BMW X1 | Installed on at least 12 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Volkswagen Golf, Volkswagen Sharan, Audi A3 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.36 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.41 m | |
| BMW 1 series is 11 cm longer than the Volkswagen Scirocco, 6 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 1 series is 2 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 370 litres | 292 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1006 litres | |
|
BMW 1 series has more luggage capacity. BMW 1 series has 78 litres more trunk space than the Volkswagen Scirocco. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.7 meters | 10.9 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW 1 series is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volkswagen Scirocco. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`860 | 1`770 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | average | |
| BMW 1 series has slightly fewer faults. Deffect rate in annual technical inspection is similar for both cars, it's slightly higher for Volkswagen Scirocco, so BMW 1 series quality could be a bit better. | |||
| Average price (€): | 6600 | 7200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW 1 sērija has
|
Volkswagen Scirocco has
| |