BMW 1 series 2011 vs Toyota Auris 2013
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.6 Petrol | 1.6 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 136 HP | 132 HP | |
Torque: | 220 NM | 160 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.1 seconds | 11.1 seconds | |
BMW 1 series is more dynamic to drive. BMW 1 series engine produces 4 HP more power than Toyota Auris, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Toyota Auris. Thanks to more power BMW 1 series reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.6 | 5.7 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 7.8 l/100km | 7.3 l/100km | |
The Toyota Auris is a better choice in terms of fuel economy based on user-reported consumption, although the specification shows otherwise. By specification BMW 1 series consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Auris, which means that by driving the BMW 1 series over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, BMW 1 series consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Toyota Auris. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 50 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 920 km in combined cycle | 870 km in combined cycle | |
1100 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
660 km with real consumption | 680 km with real consumption | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Front-wheel drive cars (Toyota Auris) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 1 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Ground clearance: | 140 mm (5.5 inches) | 135 mm (5.3 inches) | |
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 320'000 km | 350'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
Engine production duration: | 5 years | 16 years | |
Engine spread: | Used also on BMW 3 sērija | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Toyota Avensis, Toyota Verso | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Toyota Auris might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.32 m | 4.28 m | |
Width: | 1.77 m | 1.76 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.46 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. BMW 1 series is 5 cm longer than the Toyota Auris, width is practically the same , while the height of BMW 1 series is 4 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 360 litres | 360 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1200 litres | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the BMW 1 series is 0.5 metres more than that of the Toyota Auris, which means BMW 1 series can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`840 | 1`830 | |
Safety: | |||
The BMW 1 series scores significantly higher in active safety technologies (stability control, lane assist, automatic braking, etc.) tests. | |||
Quality: | average | high | |
Toyota Auris has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW 1 series has serious deffects in 35 percent more cases than Toyota Auris, so Toyota Auris quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 8000 | 7200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
BMW 1 sērija has
|
Toyota Auris has
| |