BMW 1 series 2007 vs Volvo C30 2009
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 3.0 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 265 HP | 230 HP | |
Torque: | 315 NM | 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.3 seconds | 7.1 seconds | |
BMW 1 series is more dynamic to drive. BMW 1 series engine produces 35 HP more power than Volvo C30, but torque is 5 NM less than Volvo C30. Thanks to more power BMW 1 series reaches 100 km/h speed 0.8 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.3 | 9.0 | |
The BMW 1 series is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. BMW 1 series consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C30, which means that by driving the BMW 1 series over 15,000 km in a year you can save 105 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 53 litres | 62 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 630 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
880 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
Volvo C30 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
Front-wheel drive cars (Volvo C30) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 1 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
BMW 1 sērija 2007 3.0 engine: The BMW N52 engine was the first water-cooled engine to feature a composite cylinder block made from a magnesium and aluminum alloy. It was included in Ward’s AutoWorld’s list of the top 10 engines in 2006 and 2007. While it offers many advantages, the ... More about BMW 1 sērija 2007 3.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.24 m | 4.27 m | |
Width: | 1.75 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.44 m | |
Both cars are similar in size. BMW 1 series is 3 cm shorter than the Volvo C30, 3 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 1 series is 2 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 330 litres | 251 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1150 litres | 921 litres | |
BMW 1 series has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, BMW 1 series has 79 litres more trunk space than the Volvo C30. The Volvo C30 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in BMW 1 series (by 229 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.6 meters | |
The turning circle of the BMW 1 series is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volvo C30, which means BMW 1 series can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`910 | 1`860 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | below average | |
BMW 1 series has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo C30 has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than BMW 1 series, so BMW 1 series quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 4600 | 4200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
BMW 1 sērija has
|
Volvo C30 has
| |