BMW 1 series 2007 vs Kia Ceed 2010
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 143 HP | 90 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 235 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 14.1 seconds | |
|
BMW 1 series is more dynamic to drive. BMW 1 series engine produces 53 HP more power than Kia Ceed, whereas torque is 65 NM more than Kia Ceed. Thanks to more power BMW 1 series reaches 100 km/h speed 5.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 4.5 | 4.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 5.8 l/100km | 5.5 l/100km | |
|
The Kia Ceed is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW 1 series consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW 1 series could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW 1 series consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Kia Ceed. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 51 litres | 53 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1130 km in combined cycle | 1200 km in combined cycle | |
| 1270 km on highway | 1320 km on highway | ||
| 870 km with real consumption | 960 km with real consumption | ||
| Kia Ceed gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Kia Ceed) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 1 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Engine production duration: | 17 years | 15 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW X3, BMW X1 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Hyundai i30, Kia Cerato | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW 1 series might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.24 m | 4.26 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.48 m | |
|
BMW 1 series is smaller. BMW 1 series is 2 cm shorter than the Kia Ceed, 4 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 1 series is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 330 litres | 340 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1150 litres | no data | |
| BMW 1 series has 10 litres less trunk space than the Kia Ceed. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW 1 series is 0.7 metres more than that of the Kia Ceed, which means BMW 1 series can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`830 | 1`860 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | average | below average | |
| BMW 1 series has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Kia Ceed has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than BMW 1 series, so BMW 1 series quality is probably slightly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 4400 | 4200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW 1 sērija has
|
Kia Ceed has
| |