BMW 1 series 2004 vs Volvo C30 2006
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.6 Diesel | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 163 HP | 109 HP | |
| Torque: | 340 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.9 seconds | 11.9 seconds | |
|
BMW 1 series is more dynamic to drive. BMW 1 series engine produces 54 HP more power than Volvo C30, whereas torque is 100 NM more than Volvo C30. Thanks to more power BMW 1 series reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.7 | 4.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.5 l/100km | 5.7 l/100km | |
|
The Volvo C30 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification BMW 1 series consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C30, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the BMW 1 series could require 120 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, BMW 1 series consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C30. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 50 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 870 km in combined cycle | 1120 km in combined cycle | |
| 1080 km on highway | 1300 km on highway | ||
| 760 km with real consumption | 960 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo C30 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (Volvo C30) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 1 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 390'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 9 years | 5 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on BMW 3 sērija | Installed on at least 3 other car models, including Volvo S80, Volvo S40, Volvo V50 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.23 m | 4.25 m | |
| Width: | 1.75 m | 1.78 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. BMW 1 series is 2 cm shorter than the Volvo C30, 3 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 1 series is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 330 litres | 251 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
1150 litres | no data | |
|
BMW 1 series has more luggage capacity. Even though the car is shorter, BMW 1 series has 79 litres more trunk space than the Volvo C30. The Volvo C30 may have more interior space, so the cabin could be more spacious and more comfortable for the driver and passengers. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 10.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW 1 series is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volvo C30, which means BMW 1 series can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`840 | 1`780 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | Volvo C30 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW 1 series has serious deffects in 30 percent more cases than Volvo C30, so Volvo C30 quality is probably significantly better | ||
| Average price (€): | 3000 | 4000 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 8.2/10 | 8.4/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW 1 sērija has
|
Volvo C30 has
| |