BMW 1 series 2016 vs BMW 2 series 2014
| Body: | Hatchback | Minivan / MPV | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 224 HP | 231 HP | |
| Torque: | 310 NM | 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.1 seconds | 6.8 seconds | |
| BMW 1 series engine produces 7 HP less power than BMW 2 series, whereas torque is 40 NM less than BMW 2 series. Despite less power, BMW 1 series reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | no data | 6.0 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 52 litres | 51 litres | |
| 580 km with real consumption | 590 km with real consumption | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Drive type | |||
| Wheel drive type: | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | Front wheel drive (FWD) | |
| Front-wheel drive cars (BMW 2 series) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (BMW 1 series) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 320'000 km | 320'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 12 years | 12 years | |
| Engine spread: | Installed on at least 6 other car models, including BMW 5 sērija, BMW 3 sērija, BMW X3, BMW 4 sērija | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including BMW 1 sērija, BMW X1 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. BMW 1 series might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| BMW 1 sērija 2016 2.0 engine: Compared to their predecessors, B48 engines are more robust and less prone to major failures. They are well-suited for chip tuning, which can noticeably enhance performance and responsiveness without ... More about BMW 1 sērija 2016 2.0 engine BMW 2 sērija 2014 2.0 engine: Compared to their predecessors, B48 engines are more robust and less prone to major failures. They are well-suited for chip tuning, which can noticeably enhance performance and responsiveness without ... More about BMW 2 sērija 2014 2.0 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.33 m | 4.34 m | |
| Width: | 1.77 m | 1.90 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.56 m | |
|
BMW 1 series is smaller. BMW 1 series is 1 cm shorter than the BMW 2 series, 14 cm narrower, while the height of BMW 1 series is 13 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 360 litres | 468 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
1200 litres | no data | |
|
BMW 2 series has more luggage space. BMW 1 series has 108 litres less trunk space than the BMW 2 series. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 11.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the BMW 1 series is 0.4 metres less than that of the BMW 2 series, which means BMW 1 series can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 1`965 kg | 1`970 kg | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | average | low | |
| BMW 1 series has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data BMW 2 series has serious deffects in 50 percent more cases than BMW 1 series, so BMW 1 series quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 10 000 | 10 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
BMW 1 sērija has
|
BMW 2 sērija has
| |