Audi A8 2000 vs Rover 75 1999

 
Audi A8
2000 - 2002
Rover 75
1999 - 2004
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 3.3 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 225 HP116 HP
Torque: 480 NM260 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.2 seconds11.7 seconds
Audi A8 is more dynamic to drive.
Audi A8 engine produces 109 HP more power than Rover 75, whereas torque is 220 NM more than Rover 75. Thanks to more power Audi A8 reaches 100 km/h speed 3.5 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.75.8
Real fuel consumption: 9.9 l/100km6.3 l/100km
The Rover 75 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Audi A8 consumes 3.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 75, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Audi A8 could require 585 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Audi A8 consumes 3.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 75.
Fuel tank capacity: 90 litres65 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 920 km in combined cycle1120 km in combined cycle
1230 km on highway1380 km on highway
900 km with real consumption1030 km with real consumption
Rover 75 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Drive type

Wheel drive type: All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)

Dimensions

Length: 5.03 m4.75 m
Width: 1.88 m1.78 m
Height: 1.44 m1.43 m
Audi A8 is larger.
Audi A8 is 28 cm longer than the Rover 75, 10 cm wider, while the height of Audi A8 is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 525 litres432 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data432 litres
Audi A8 has more luggage capacity.
Audi A8 has 93 litres more trunk space than the Rover 75.
Turning diameter: 12.3 meters11.4 meters
The turning circle of the Audi A8 is 0.9 metres more than that of the Rover 75, which means Audi A8 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`4602`030
Safety: no data
Quality:
average
no data
Average price (€): 30001800
Pros and Cons: Audi A8 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • has 4x4 drive
  • roomier boot
Rover 75 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv